Randolph Smithfield is a cost analyst with Franklin
We are the Best Company Offering Online Assignment Help Services
Randolph Smithfield is a cost analyst with Franklin Randolph Smithfield is a cost analyst with Franklin Insurance Company. Franklin is applying standards to its claims payment operation. Claims payment is a repetitive operation that could be evaluated with standards. Randolph used time and motion studies to identify an ideal standard of 36 claims processed per hour. The Claims Processing Department manager, Fred Jones, has rejected this standard and has argued that the standard should be 30 claims processed per hour. Fred and Randolph were unable to agree, so they decided to discuss this matter openly at a joint meeting with the vice president of operations, who would arbitrate a final decision. Prior to the meeting, Randolph wrote the following memo to the VP.To: Linda Greene, Vice President of OperationsFrom: Randolph SmithfieldRe: Standards in the Claims Processing DepartmentAs you know, Fred and I are scheduled to meet with you to discuss our disagreement with respect to the appropriate standards for the Claims Processing Department. I have conducted time and motion studies and have determined that the ideal standard is 36 claims processed per hour. Fred argues that 30 claims processed per hour would be more appropriate. I believe he is trying to âpadâ the budget with some slack. Iâm not sure what he is trying to get away with, but I believe a tight standard will drive efficiency up in his area. I hope you will agree when we meet with you next week.Required: Discuss the ethical and professional issues in this situation. Who is more correct, Randolph or Fred? If you were Linda Greene, how would you handle this conflict?Discussion Rubric: 60 â Thoroughly discussed question(s) and all aspects of the discussion prompt. Length @ 200 words. Sources used to provide a literature based answer rather than simple opinion. Proper grammar, spelling, and APA citation style is expected. 40 â Substantive Response to at least two classmates. A substantive response extends the discussion and adds to the richness of the content. A substantive response is not simply agreeing or disagreeing, it is not simply complimenting a classmate on a good post, and it is not simply stating the problem with an issue without offering ideas and solutions.